December 29, 2006 :: Curt Van Emon

Retirement Lies We Tell Ourselves - Pt. 1 (WSJ)

The Wall Street Journal recently had an excellent column titled “Retirement Lies We Tell Ourselves.”

Over the next few weeks, I will put a piece of that article here to provide you the opportunity to think about these different “lies” and to reflect if you are telling yourself this or not.

We (the Wall Street Journal) asked financial planners, educators and economists across the country to share with us some of the most risky assumptions — or outright lies — that people are crafting as they approach retirement. The thinking usually goes something like this: “I might not be in the best shape when it comes to planning for later life, but that’s OK because…”

“I’m going to work in retirement.”

The idea of working in later life is one of the most prominent features of what’s frequently called the “changing face of retirement.” A number of surveys have shown that about two-thirds to three-quarters of baby boomers expect to work for pay after retiring. It certainly sounds good; staying active as we age can promote mental and physical health. And the added income, obviously, could help patch any cracks in your nest egg.

The problem is that you might not be able to work in retirement. You might develop health problems; you might not find the kind of work you want, or jobs in your area could be in short supply. Indeed, many workers in their 50s and 60s are having a tough time keeping the jobs they have — never mind finding new jobs in retirement. A study published this year by McKinsey & Co., a consulting firm, found that 40% of surveyed retirees had to stop working earlier than planned, a consequence primarily of layoffs and poor health.

Predicting what boomers actually will do as they age is always a chancy exercise. But one way to gauge expectations about working in retirement is to look at the experiences of people who have already collected their gold watch. A survey published earlier this year by the Employee Benefit Research Institute in Washington found that just 27% of surveyed retirees had ever worked for pay while in retirement. A similar study published in September by the Pew Research Center, also in Washington, found that only 12% of current retirees are collecting a salary.

REALITY CHECK: For the moment, “there’s a big disconnect between what people say they will do, or might do, versus what people are doing,” says Cary Funk, senior project director at the Pew Center.

Yes, that could change: The sheer size of the baby-boom generation could mean that more boomers, in contrast to their parents, will end up working in retirement. But if you’re counting on a paycheck in your 60s and 70s to help compensate for inadequate retirement savings, you could be in for a nasty surprise.




December 27, 2006 :: Mark Lederer

What Kind of Home Can You Get For $1,000,000?

Wondering what $1,000,000 buys? Forbes online has just posted an article citing that, “One million dollars doesn’t buy very much in the most desirable global property locations”.

Being that I am a San Francisco Bay Area real estate agent who has sold many $1,000,000 Bay Area homes, I beg to differ. Below are some fantastic homes that have recently sold for $1,000,000 or less. Although housing is expensive the media tends to exaggerate and perpetuate misleading market information. I believe that the Bay Area is one of the worlds most desirable locations to live in and you can still get a fantastic home in the Bay Area for $1,000,000 or less. Below are 3 examples of East Bay homes in great neighborhoods that sold in December of 2006 for $1,000,000 or less.

554 Santa Barbara Road - Berkeley

Sales Price: $960,000

Sales Date: December 1, 2006

Click Photos to Enlarge (View Map)

554 Santa Barbara Exterior554 Santa Barbara Kitchen554 Santa Barbara View

6247 Ridgemont - Oakland

Sales Price: $1,000,000

Sales Date: December 15, 2006

Click Photos to Enlarge (View Map)

6247ridgemont_exterior.jpg6247ridgemont_bed.jpg6247ridgemont_yard.jpg

63 Wildwood - Piedmont

Sales Price: $960,000

Sales Date: December 8, 2006

Click Photos to Enlarge (View Map)

63 Wildwood Avenue Living63 Wildwood Avenue Kitchen63 Wildwood Avenue Yard




December 20, 2006 :: Mark Lederer

Need a Gift For the Person Who Has Everything?

being that it is the gift giving season, I have been searching for unique real estate and property oriented gifts. This one comes from an Italian design company called Wet Studio. They have taken common household bath fixtures and made them in to a unique illuminating experience.
Illuminated Bath Tub and Sink From Wet Studio

Illuminated Bath Tub and Sink From Wet Studio

Illuminated Bath Tub and Sink From Wet Studio




December 18, 2006 :: Mark Lederer

November East Bay Economic Data

The East Bay Economic Development Alliance (www.edab.org) just released their November report. I have posted the interesting real estate portions of the report and commentary below or you can view a full PDF of the report here.

snapshot.jpg

(more…)




December 16, 2006 :: Mark Lederer

Bay Area Takes 2 Spots On The Forbes Top 10 Smartest Cities in the US

Looking for an intelligent place to call home. Look no further then our very own Bay Area. Both San Francisco and San Jose ranked in the Forbes Top Ten. Visit Forbes online list here.

Top Ten Smartest Cities

  1. Boulder, Colorado
  2. Bethesda, Maryland
  3. Ann Arbor, Michigan
  4. Cambridge, Massachusetts
  5. San Francisco, California
  6. Durham, North, Carolina
  7. Fort Collins - Loveland, Colorado
  8. Washington D.C.
  9. Bridgeport, Stanford, and Norwalk, Connecticut
  10. San Jose, California

Many of these cities also have some of the United States most expensive real estate.




December 13, 2006 :: Mark Lederer

Zillow - How Inaccurate Data Could Harm Your Homes Value

Zillow recently announced that they will be listing homes for sale on their web site.

On October 26, 2006 Zillow came under fire by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC). NCRC publicly filed a consumer protection complaint with the Federal Trade Commission. They are alleging the, “Internet financial services and real estate provider Zillow.com is misleading consumers, real estate professionals and financial service providers in on-line home valuations. ” You can view the NCRC’s complaint on their web site (www.ncrc.org). It was a bit comical that this filing stirred so much attention and controversy. Real estate agents have long known that Zillows estimates (which they call, “Zestimates”) are often inaccurate and should not be used to asses the value of a property.

On December 7, 2006 Zillow announced an upgrade to their site. This upgrade includes a posting feature that allows for individuals and agents to post real estate listings on the site. As Business 2.0’s blog indicates Zillow is, “stepping squarely onto Trulia’s turf.” Trulia along with Craigslist, Google Base, Vast, PropSmart, Edgeio, Oodle and others are all currently fighting for being the predominant internet search tool for real estate listings.
As a Realtor who worked in advertising prior to becoming an agent, I find that a seller looking to put their home on the market should have their agent submit their property to many of these real estate search tools. I usually live by the expression, “the more exposure your property gets the better.” Yet, in terms of Zillow’s new listing search tool, I think posters should proceed with caution. Zillow is now marrying listings with its inaccurate estimate data. This inaccurate data may have a negative impact on a sellers listing.

Real estate agents need to keep on top of new advertising avenues for their clients. It is our responsibility to generate the maximum positive exposure for the listings we promote. I currently utilize many of the new services for advertising a listing online. I track the traffic that comes from each service and I use this data to better serve my clients.